Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Jan;21(1):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1785-5. Epub 2011 Nov 24.

Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: comparison between manual and computer-assisted techniques.

Author information

1
Orthopaedic Unit and Kirk Kilgour Sports Injury Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Largo Olgiata 15, isola 75 edificio 3/2, 00123, Rome, RM, Italy.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

The purpose of our study was to compare clinical and radiological results of two groups of patients treated for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with either conventional or computer-assisted open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Goals of surgical treatment were a correction of the mechanical axis between 2° and 6° of valgus and a modification of posterior tibial slope between -2° and +2°.

METHODS:

Twenty-four patients (27 knees) affected by varus knee deformity and operated with HTO were prospectively followed-up. They were randomly divided in two groups, A (11 patients, conventional treatment) and B (13 patients, navigated treatment). The American Knee Society Score and the Modified Cincinnati Rating System Questionnaire were used for clinical assessment. All patients were radiologically evaluated with a comparative lower limb weight-bearing digital radiograph, a standard digital anteroposterior, a latero-lateral radiograph of the knee, and a Rosenberg view.

RESULTS:

Patients were followed-up at a mean of 39 months. Clinical evaluation showed no statistical difference (n.s.) between the two groups. Radiological results showed an 86% reproducibility in achieving a mechanical axis of 182°-186° in group B compared to a 23% in group A (p = 0.0392); furthermore, in group B, we achieved a modification of posterior tibial slope between -2° and +2° in 100% of patients, while in group A, this goal was achieved only in 24% of cases (p = 0.0021).

CONCLUSION:

High tibial osteotomy with navigator is more accurate and reproducible in the correction of the deformity compared to standard technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Therapeutic study, Level II.

PMID:
22113220
DOI:
10.1007/s00167-011-1785-5
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center