Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Acad Med. 2012 Jan;87(1):51-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823aadc7.

Perspective: publication ethics and the emerging scientific workforce: understanding "plagiarism" in a global context.

Author information

1
Cancer Prevention Research Training Program, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77230-3721, USA. ccameron@mdanderson.org

Abstract

English has long been the dominant language of scientific publication, and it is rapidly approaching near-complete hegemony. The majority of the scientists publishing in English-language journals are not native English speakers, however. This imbalance has important implications for training concerning ethics and enforcement of publication standards, particularly with respect to plagiarism. The authors suggest that lack of understanding of what constitutes plagiarism and the use of a linguistic support strategy known as "patchwriting" can lead to inadvertent misuse of source material by nonnative speakers writing in English as well as to unfounded accusations of intentional scientific misconduct on the part of these authors. They propose that a rational and well-informed dialogue about this issue is needed among editors, educators, administrators, and both native-English-speaking and nonnative-English-speaking writers. They offer recommendations for creating environments in which such dialogue and training can occur.

PMID:
22104051
PMCID:
PMC3869232
DOI:
10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823aadc7
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center