Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Oct;5(10):e1326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001326. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminth control in Niger: cost effectiveness of school based and community distributed mass drug administration [corrected].

Author information

1
Schistosomiasis Control Initiative, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. j.leslie@imperial.ac.uk

Erratum in

  • PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012 Apr;6(4): doi/10.1371/annotation/30823662-77ac-4ac3-bd32-6f300121ac3f.
  • PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012 Apr;6(4): doi/10.1371/annotation/d9dce505-07d7-4d19-8c2f-9f707bddc287.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

In 2004 Niger established a large scale schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminths control programme targeting children aged 5-14 years and adults. In two years 4.3 million treatments were delivered in 40 districts using school based and community distribution.

METHOD AND FINDINGS:

Four districts were surveyed in 2006 to estimate the economic cost per district, per treatment and per schistosomiasis infection averted. The study compares the costs of treatment at start up and in a subsequent year, identifies the allocation of costs by activity, input and organisation, and assesses the cost of treatment. The cost of delivery provided by teachers is compared to cost of delivery by community distributers (CDD). The total economic cost of the programme including programmatic, national and local government costs and international support in four study districts, over two years, was US$ 456,718; an economic cost/treatment of $0.58. The full economic delivery cost of school based treatment in 2005/06 was $0.76, and for community distribution was $0.46. Including only the programme costs the figures are $0.47 and $0.41 respectively. Differences at sub-district are more marked. This is partly explained by the fact that a CDD treats 5.8 people for every one treated in school. The range in cost effectiveness for both direct and direct and indirect treatments is quantified and the need to develop and refine such estimates is emphasised.

CONCLUSIONS:

The relative cost effectiveness of school and community delivery differs by country according to the composition of the population treated, the numbers targeted and treated at school and in the community, the cost and frequency of training teachers and CDDs. Options analysis of technical and implementation alternatives including a financial analysis should form part of the programme design process.

PMID:
22022622
PMCID:
PMC3191121
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pntd.0001326
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center