Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Stat Med. 2011 Nov 20;30(26):3082-94. doi: 10.1002/sim.4326. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

An informed reference prior for between-study heterogeneity in meta-analyses of binary outcomes.

Author information

1
Department of Clinical Epidemiologyand Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. pullena@mcmaster.ca

Abstract

It is well known that when a Bayesian meta-analysis includes a small number of studies, inference can be sensitive to the choice of prior for the between-study variance. Choosing a vague prior does not solve the problem, as inferences can be substantially different depending on the degree of vagueness. Moreover, because the data provide little information on between-study heterogeneity, posterior inferences for the between-study variance based on vague priors will tend to be unrealistic. It is thus preferable to adopt a reasonable, informed prior for the between-study variance. However, relatively little is known about what constitutes a realistic distribution. On the basis of data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, this paper describes the distribution of between-study variance in published meta-analyses, and proposes some realistic, informed priors for use in meta-analyses of binary outcomes. It is hoped that these priors will improve the calibration of inferences from Bayesian meta-analyses.

PMID:
22020726
DOI:
10.1002/sim.4326
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center