Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Nov;22(11):1270-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02102.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.

Clinical wear of overdenture ball attachments after 1, 3 and 8 years.

Author information

1
UFR of Odontology, Paris 7-Denis Diderot University, Paris, France.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

Implant-supported overdentures have become the treatment of choice in restoring complete edentulism, but the types of attachment to assure durable retention are a subject of debate. Ball attachments were reported as a simple treatment, but wear of components was responsible for a decrease in retention. The aim of this retrospective study was to measure the wear of the ball abutment or patrix after three different periods of clinical wear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Sixty-nine specimens of three groups of patrix that were in use for a mean of 12.3 months (group A), 39 months (group B) and 95.6 months (group C) were retrieved from 35 patients and measured on a coordinate measuring machine equipped with a touch trigger probe. Ten unused ball abutments were added as a control (group D). The patrix diameters and any deviation from circularity in different axes were measured.

RESULTS:

The diameters of groups A, B and C were significantly different from that of group D (control). No statistically significant differences were found between diameter and circularity variations between groups B and C. The maximal amount of diameter reduction was limited to approximately 30 μm, and 90% of diameter loss at the equator due to wear was reached in group B.

CONCLUSION:

One, 3 and 8 years of clinical wear reduced significantly the diameters of the ball abutments tested, and the maximal amount of wear was reached after 3 years of clinical use.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center