Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ann Hum Genet. 2011 Nov;75(6):723-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2011.00677.x.

Analysis of potential genomic confounding in genetic association studies and an online genomic confounding browser (GCB).

Author information

1
Bristol Genetic Epidemiology Laboratories, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have transformed genetic studies of disease susceptibility, identifying many variants that may tag functional polymorphism nearby. Variants are often ascribed to a physically close gene exhibiting plausible functionality for a causal pathway. However, more physically remote genes may be at a lesser linkage or linkage disequilibrium (LD) distance from the tested SNP and could therefore contain the functional variant tagged. This analysis aims to identify instances where research may be misled by misassociation of a variant with a gene and develop tools to analyse genomic confounding. A catalogue of reported associations was systematically analysed for unreported genes which may represent the true functionality ascribed to a reported variant, calculating physical and genetic distances for all genes within 1 cM of the tagging polymorphism. Results revealed 55 SNPs where recombination was lower between the identified SNP and a physically more remote gene than initially reported, and 374 where an alternative gene was genetically and physically closer than the reported gene. Analyses show potential for genomic confounding through false inferences of variant association to a gene. An online visualization tool (http://gcb.genes.org.uk/) was developed to plot genes by physical and genetic distance relative to a variant, along with LD data.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center