Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Public Health. 2011 Nov;101(11):2021-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300200. Epub 2011 Sep 22.

Changing the constitutional landscape for firearms: the US Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment decisions.

Author information

1
Johns HopkinsBloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. jvernick@jhsph.edu

Abstract

In 2 recent cases-with important implications for public health practitioners, courts, and researchers-the US Supreme Court changed the landscape for judging the constitutionality of firearm laws under the Constitution's Second Amendment. In District of Columbia v Heller (2008), the court determined for the first time that the Second Amendment grants individuals a personal right to possess handguns in their home. In McDonald v City of Chicago (2010), the court concluded that this right affects the powers of state and local governments. The court identified broad categories of gun laws-other than handgun bans-that remain presumptively valid but did not provide a standard to judge their constitutionality. We discuss ways that researchers can assist decision makers.

PMID:
21940936
PMCID:
PMC3222390
DOI:
10.2105/AJPH.2011.300200
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center