Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Nurs Adm. 2011 Oct;41(10):428-33. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822eddbc.

Nurse outcomes in Magnet® and non-magnet hospitals.

Author information

1
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. leslykelly@gmail.com

Erratum in

  • J Nurs Adm. 2012 Jan;42(1):33.

Abstract

The important goals of Magnet hospitals are to create supportive professional nursing care environments. A recently published paper found little difference in work environments between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine whether work environments, staffing, and nurse outcomes differ between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. A secondary analysis of data from a 4-state survey of 26,276 nurses in 567 acute care hospitals to evaluate differences in work environments and nurse outcomes in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals was conducted. Magnet hospitals had significantly better work environments (t = -5.29, P < .001) and more highly educated nurses (t = -2.27, P < .001). Magnet hospital nurses were 18% less likely to be dissatisfied with their job (P < .05) and 13% less likely to report high burnout (P < .05). Magnet hospitals have significantly better work environments than non-Magnet hospitals. The better work environments of Magnet hospitals are associated with lower levels of nurse job dissatisfaction and burnout.

PMID:
21934430
PMCID:
PMC3201819
DOI:
10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822eddbc
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center