Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):261-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822d750d.

Rationing in the intensive care unit: to disclose or disguise?

Author information

1
Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Growing pressures to ration intensive care unit beds and services pose novel challenges to clinicians. Whereas the question of how to allocate scarce intensive care unit resources has received much attention, the question of whether to disclose these decisions to patients and surrogates has not been explored.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS:

We explore how considerations of professionalism, dual agency, patients' and surrogates' preferences, beneficence, and healthcare efficiency and efficacy influence the propriety of disclosing rationing decisions in the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSIONS:

There are compelling conceptual reasons to support a policy of routine disclosure. Systematic disclosure of prevailing intensive care unit norms for making allocation decisions, and of at least the most consequential specific decisions, can promote transparent, professional, and effective healthcare delivery. However, many empiric questions about how best to structure and implement disclosure processes remain to be answered. Specifically, research is needed to determine how best to operationalize disclosure processes so as to maximize prospective benefits to patients and surrogates and minimize burdens on clinicians and intensive care units.

PMID:
21926611
DOI:
10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822d750d
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Support Center