Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Med Qual. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):154-69. doi: 10.1177/1062860611414697. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

A review of patient safety measures based on routinely collected hospital data.

Author information

1
Dr Foster Unit at Imperial College, Imperial College, London, UK. c.tsang@imperial.ac.uk

Abstract

The literature on patient safety measures derived from routinely collected hospital data was reviewed to inform indicator development. MEDLINE and Embase databases and Web sites were searched. Of 1738 citations, 124 studies describing the application, evaluation, or validation of hospital-based medical error or complication of care measures were reviewed. Studies were frequently conducted in the United States (n = 88) between 2005 and 2009 (n = 77) using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators (PSIs; n = 79). The most frequently cited indicators included "postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma" and "accidental puncture and laceration." Indicator refinement is supported by international coding algorithm translations but is hampered by data issues, including coding inconsistencies. The validity of PSIs and similar adverse event screens beyond internal measurement and the effects of organizational factors on patient harm remain uncertain. Development of PSIs in ambulatory care settings, including general practice and psychiatric care, needs consideration.

PMID:
21896785
DOI:
10.1177/1062860611414697
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Support Center