Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Nov;34(11):1460-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03212.x.

The impact of pharmacologic sympathetic and parasympathetic blockade on atrial electrogram characteristics in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Ablation of atrial autonomic inputs exerts antifibrillatory effects. However, because ablation destroys both myocardium and nerve cells, the effect of autonomic withdrawal alone remains unclear. We therefore examined the effects of pharmacologic autonomic blockade (PAB) on frequency and fractionation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS:

Esmolol and atropine were administered and electrograms were recorded simultaneously from both atria and the coronary sinus. In 17 patients, AF was recorded for 5 minutes and dominant frequency (DF) and continuous activity (CA) were compared before and during PAB.

RESULTS:

Examination of the pooled data (537 sites, 17 patients) revealed a statistically significant decrease in mean DF (5.61–5.43Hz, P < 0.001) during PAB. Site-by-site analysis showed that 67% of sites slowed (0.45 ± 0.59 Hz), whereas 32% accelerated (0.49 ± 0.59Hz). Fractionation was reduced: median CA decreased from 31% to 26% (P < 0.001). In patient-by-patient analysis, mean DF/median CA decreased in 13 of 17 patients and increased in four. The spatial heterogeneity of DF decreased in nine of 17 patients (spatial coefficient of variation of DF at "nondriver sites" decreased by a mean of 2%).

CONCLUSION:

PAB decreases DF and CA in the majority of sites. Given the complexity of interactions between atrial cells during AF, the effects of PAB on DF and fractionation are more heterogeneous than the effects of PAB on isolated cells.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center