Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Chem Commun (Camb). 2011 Oct 14;47(38):10641-3. doi: 10.1039/c1cc13002a. Epub 2011 Aug 26.

Patterning small-molecule biocapture surfaces: microcontact insertion printing vs. photolithography.

Author information

1
Center for Nanoscale Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Erratum in

  • Chem Commun (Camb). 2012 Dec 28;48(100):12253. Martinez, M M [corrected to Martinez-Rivera, M].

Abstract

Chemical patterns prepared by self-assembly, combined with soft lithography or photolithography, are directly compared. Pattern fidelity can be controlled in both cases but patterning at the low densities necessary for small-molecule probe capture of large biomolecule targets is better accomplished using microcontact insertion printing (μCIP). Surfaces patterned by μCIP are used to capture biomolecule binding partners for the small molecules dopamine and biotin.

PMID:
21874174
DOI:
10.1039/c1cc13002a
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Royal Society of Chemistry
    Loading ...
    Support Center