Send to

Choose Destination
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Nov;13(5):490-3; discussion 493. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2011.280941. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

Impact of the learning curve in the use of a novel electronic chest drainage system after pulmonary lobectomy: a case-matched analysis on the duration of chest tube usage.

Author information

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Riuniti Hospitals Ancona, Ancona, Italy.


The objective of this investigation was to verify the impact of the learning curve involved after the introduction of a novel electronic chest drainage device on the duration of chest tube usage following pulmonary lobectomy. Propensity score case-matched analysis was used to compare the first consecutive 51 lobectomy patients managed with an electronic chest drainage (E) device with 51 controls managed with a traditional device (T). There was no difference in the characteristics of the two matched groups. Compared with patients managed with a traditional device, those with the electronic one had 1.9-day shorter duration of chest tube drainage (2.5 vs. 4.4 days; P<0.0001) and a 1.5-day shorter hospital stay (4.5 vs. 6 days; P=0.0003). Consequently, they had an average reduction in hospital costs of €751 (€1802 vs. €2553; P=0.0002). Compared with those in group T, patients in group E had a consistently shorter duration of chest tube use in relation to the very first patients treated. The learning curve sloped down for the first 40 patients before reaching a plateau, when the maximum benefit of using the electronic device was evident. Compared with traditional devices, the use of a novel electronic chest drainage system was beneficial from its initial application. The inherent learning curve was short and did not affect the efficiency of the system.

Comment in

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center