Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Arch Dermatol. 2011 Dec;147(12):1371-6. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.203. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

Propranolol vs corticosteroids for infantile hemangiomas: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, Division of Pediatric Dermatology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To determine whether propranolol therapy is safe and effective and superior to oral corticosteroids for treating infantile hemangiomas (IHs).

DESIGN:

Multicenter retrospective chart review.

SETTING:

University of Miami and Miami Children's Hospital, Miami, Florida. Patients  The study included 110 patients with IHs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

The percentage of clearance was quantified by documented serial global photography and clinical examinations (length, height, and width) to segregate patients into 2 groups: patients who had clearance of 75% or more and patients who had less than 75% clearance.

RESULTS:

The mean duration of treatment was 7.9 months for propranolol and 5.2 months for oral corticosteroids. Fifty-six of 68 patients (82%) who were receiving propranolol achieved clearance of 75% or more compared with 12 of 42 patients (29%) who were receiving oral corticosteroids (P < .01). Adverse effects were minimal in the propranolol group: 1 patient had hypoglycemia and 2 patients had a nonspecifice skin eruption that was not associated with propranolol therapy. All 42 patients in the corticosteroid group had 1 or more adverse effects (P < .01). Relapse after discontinuation of propranolol therapy occurred in 2 of the 68 patients; however, both patients responded to propranolol therapy on reinitiation of treatment. Surgical referrals after treatment were required in 8 patients (12%) in the propranolol group and 12 patients (29%) in the oral corticosteroid group (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Propranolol therapy was more clinically effective and more cost-effective than oral corticosteroids in treating IHs. It also resulted in fewer surgical interventions and demonstrated better tolerance, with minimal adverse effects, compared with oral corticosteroids. Therefore, propranolol should be considered a first-line agent given its safety and efficacy in the treatment of IHs.

PMID:
21844428
DOI:
10.1001/archdermatol.2011.203
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center