Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Biologicals. 2011 Sep;39(5):266-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Jul 31.

Statistical considerations for confirmatory clinical trials for similar biotherapeutic products.

Author information

1
Biostatistics Unit, Centre for Vaccine Evaluation, Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, 251 Sir Frederick Banting Driveway, Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

For the purpose of comparing the efficacy and safety of a Similar Biotherapeutic Product (SBP) to a Reference Biotherapeutic Product (RBP), the "Guidelines on Evaluation of Similar Biotherapeutic Products (SBPs)" issued by the World Health Organisation (WHO), states that equivalence or non-inferiority studies may be acceptable. While in principle, equivalence trials are preferred, non-inferiority trials may be considered if appropriately justified, such as for a medicinal product with a wide safety margin. However, the statistical issues involved in the design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of equivalence and non-inferiority trials are complex and subtle, and require that all aspects of these trials be given careful consideration. These issues are important in order to ensure that equivalence and non-inferiority trials provide valid data that are necessary to draw reliable conclusions regarding the clinical similarity of an SBP to an RBP.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center