Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Aug;92(8):1293-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.021.

The trans-femoral fitting predictor: a functional measure to predict prosthetic fitting in transfemoral amputees--validity and reliability.

Author information

1
National Centre for Prosthetics and Orthotics, University of Strathclyde, 131 St James Road, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. m.e.condie@strath.ac.uk.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the psychometric properties of the Trans-femoral Fitting Predictor (TFP).

DESIGN:

Prospective observational study.

SETTING:

Hospital sites (N=9).

PARTICIPANTS:

Transfemoral amputees (N=93).

INTERVENTION:

The TFP, a 9-item instrument describing graded tasks, aims to assess the prosthetic potential of transfemoral amputees. The instrument was used in its paper form (N=93) and for a video assessment of a subset of these amputees (n=75).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):

Reliability and validity of the TFP, both paper and video assessments.

RESULTS:

The TFP yielded Cronbach α of .92, and all intraclass correlation coefficients between values were greater than 0.8, with narrow 95% confidence intervals. Factor analysis suggested the TFP had 2 constructs representing more advanced and less advanced tasks. Both discriminant analysis and logistic regression suggested that tasks 7 (stand with early walking aid [EWA] for 30s) and 8 (walk to the end of the parallel bars with the EWA and turn around) were more predictive of whether an amputee will go on to receive a prosthesis.

CONCLUSION:

The TFP is a simple, valid, and reliable measure of prosthetic potential for transfemoral amputees. Video assessment with the TFP was very successful and in the future could be used for both training purposes and to provide expert assessment through telehealth.

PMID:
21807149
DOI:
10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.021
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center