Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:842767. doi: 10.1093/ecam/neq074. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

Revisiting the Sham: Is It all Smoke and Mirrors?

Author information

1
Eastern Center for Complementary Medicine, PC, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Abstract

The misuse of sham controls in examining the efficacy or effectiveness of Complementary and Alternative Medicine has created numerous problems. The theoretical justification for incorporating a sham is questionable. The sham does not improve our control of bias and leads to relativistic data that, in most instances, has no appropriate interpretation with regards to treatment efficacy. Even the concept of a sham or placebo control in an efficacy trial is inherently paradoxical. Therefore, it is prudent to re-examine how we view sham controls in the context of medical research. Extreme caution should be used in giving weight to any sham-controlled study claiming to establish efficacy or safety.

PMID:
21785635
PMCID:
PMC3137704
DOI:
10.1093/ecam/neq074
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Hindawi Publishing Corporation Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center