Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Jun;12(3):169-77. doi: 10.1089/sur.2011.036. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

Reducing the risk of surgical site infections: did we really think SCIP was going to lead us to the promised land?

Author information

1
Surgical Microbiology Research Laboratory, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA. edmiston@mcw.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with substantial patient morbidity and death. It is estimated that 750,000-1 million SSIs occur in the U.S. each year, utilizing 3.7 million extra hospital days and costing more than $1.6 billion in excess hospital charges.

METHOD:

Review of pertinent English-language literature.

RESULTS:

The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) was embraced as a "one-size-fits-all" strategy to reduce postoperative infectious morbidity 25% by 2010. Unfortunately, the evidence suggests that SCIP by itself has had little efficacy in reducing the overall risk of SSI. Whereas the SCIP initiative represents a first national effort to focus on reducing postoperative infectious morbidity and deaths, it fails to consider salient risk factors such as body mass index and selected surgical practices, including tourniquet application prior to incision.

CONCLUSION:

Rather than focus on a single risk-reduction strategy, future efforts to improve surgical outcomes should embrace a "SCIP-plus" multi-faceted, tiered interventional strategy that includes pre-admission antiseptic showering, state-of-the-art skin antisepsis, innovative antimicrobial technology, active staphylococcal surveillance, and pharmacologic-physiologic considerations unique to selective patient populations.

Comment in

PMID:
21767147
DOI:
10.1089/sur.2011.036
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center