Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):625-30. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318228235d.

Humane terminal extubation reconsidered: the role for preemptive analgesia and sedation.

Author information

1
Massachusetts General Hospital, Cambridge, MA, USA. Jbillings@partners.org

Abstract

Patient comfort is not assured by common practices for terminal extubation. Treatment guidelines suggest minimizing dosage of opioids and sedatives. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that clinicians are limited in their ability to recognize distress in such patients and tend to undermedicate patients in distress. Yet suffering of any significant degree should be unacceptable. For painful procedures, such as surgery, the analogous practice of postponing anesthesia until the patient evidences discomfort would never be tolerated. Waiting for signs of suffering before initiating excellent analgesia and sedation inexorably subjects patients to distress. Therefore, when death is inevitable and imminent after extubation, suffering should be anticipated, concerns about respiratory depression dismissed, and vigorous preemptive deep sedation or anesthesia provided.

PMID:
21765350
DOI:
10.1097/CCM.0b013e318228235d
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins - Ovid Insights
    Loading ...
    Support Center