Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services.

Author information

1
The Nature Conservancy, 1917 1st Ave, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. kvigerstol@tnc.org

Abstract

Interest in ecosystem services has grown tremendously among a wide range of sectors, including government agencies, NGO's and the business community. Ecosystem services entailing freshwater (e.g. flood control, the provision of hydropower, and water supply), as well as carbon storage and sequestration, have received the greatest attention in both scientific and on-the-ground applications. Given the newness of the field and the variety of tools for predicting water-based services, it is difficult to know which tools to use for different questions. There are two types of freshwater-related tools--traditional hydrologic tools and newer ecosystem services tools. Here we review two of the most prominent tools of each type and their possible applications. In particular, we compare the data requirements, ease of use, questions addressed, and interpretability of results among the models. We discuss the strengths, challenges and most appropriate applications of the different models. Traditional hydrological tools provide more detail whereas ecosystem services tools tend to be more accessible to non-experts and can provide a good general picture of these ecosystem services. We also suggest gaps in the modeling toolbox that would provide the greatest advances by improving existing tools.

PMID:
21763063
DOI:
10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center