Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jul 16.

First eye prediction error improves second eye refractive outcome results in 2129 patients after bilateral sequential cataract surgery.

Author information

1
Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, University of Bristol, Bristol Eye Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol, United Kingdom. topetros@yahoo.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To define theoretical correction factors for second-eye intraocular lens (IOL) power adjustment based on first eye refractive prediction error (PE).

DESIGN:

Database study.

PARTICIPANTS:

We included 2129 patients who underwent bilateral sequential phacoemulsification cataract surgery with the same IOL model.

METHODS:

Retrospectively calculated PEs (Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T) were analyzed for association between paired eyes, examining the effect of interocular differences in axial length (AL) and corneal power. A range of correction factors (CF) derived from the first eye PE were applied to the second eye PE using optimized and non-optimized IOL constants (IOLCs).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Second eye mean absolute error (MAE).

RESULTS:

Prediction errors of paired eyes were correlated. Interocular corneal power differences exceeding 0.60 diopters (D) were associated with a weaker correlation but interocular AL differences did not affect the correlation. When a 50% CF was applied to second eyes of patients with a first eye PE between ±0.50 and ±1.50 D, it improved refractive outcomes from 30%, 56%, and 92% to 42%, 75%, and 96% within ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D, respectively, and reduced the MAE from 0.49 to 0.37 D (P<0.0001). For first eye PE below ±0.50 D, a 50% CF reduced the MAE from 0.32 to 0.30 D (P<0.00001). A 50% CF also reduces second eye MAE for eyes with nonoptimized IOLCs.

CONCLUSIONS:

A 50% CF reduces second eye PE when either first eye optimized PE is within ±1.50 D or when nonoptimized IOLCs are used. The correlation is weaker when interocular corneal power differences are >0.60 D.

Comment in

PMID:
21762991
DOI:
10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.010
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center