Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Pediatr. 2011 Nov;159(5):783-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.05.014. Epub 2011 Jul 14.

Accuracy of interpretation of preparticipation screening electrocardiograms.

Author information

1
Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the accuracy of pediatric cardiologists' interpretations of electrocardiograms (ECGs).

STUDY DESIGN:

A series of 18 ECGs that represented conditions causing pediatric sudden cardiac death or normal hearts were interpreted by 53 members of the Western Society of Pediatric Cardiology. Gold-standard diagnoses and recommendations were determined by 2 electrophysiologists (100% concordance).

RESULTS:

The average number of correct ECG interpretations per respondent was 12.4 ± 2.2 (69%, range 34%-98%). Respondents achieved a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 70% for recognition of any abnormality. The false-positive and false-negative rates were 30% and 32%, respectively. Based on actual ECG diagnosis, sports participation was accurately permitted in 74% of cases and accurately restricted in 81% of cases. Respondents gave correct sports guidance most commonly in cases of long QT syndrome and myocarditis (98% and 90%, respectively) and least commonly in cases of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and pulmonary hypertension (80%, 64%, and 38%, respectively). Respondents ordered more follow-up tests than did experts.

CONCLUSIONS:

Preparticipation screening ECGs are difficult to interpret. Mistakes in ECG interpretation could lead to high rates of inappropriate sports guidance. A consequence of diagnostic error is overuse of ancillary diagnostic tests.

PMID:
21752393
DOI:
10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.05.014
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center