Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Pediatr Dent. 2011 May-Jun;33(3):207-12.

Comparison of enamel defects in the primary and permanent dentitions of children from a low-fluoride District in Australia.

Author information

1
Professor and director, Centre for Paediatric Dentistry Research and Training, School of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. k.seow@uq.edu.au

Abstract

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study was to compare developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in the primary and permanent dentitions of children from a low-fluoride district.

METHODS:

A total of 517 healthy schoolchildren were examined using the modified DDE criteria.

RESULTS:

The prevalence of DDE in the primary and permanent dentition was 25% and 58%, respectively (P<.001). The mean number of teeth with enamel opacity per subject was approximately threefold compared to that affected by enamel hypoplasia (3.1±3.8 vs 0.8±1.4, P<.001 in the primary dentition and 3.6±4.7 vs 1.2±2.2, P<.001 in the permanent dentition). Demarcated opacities (83%) were predominant compared to diffuse opacities (17%), while missing enamel was the most common type of enamel hypoplasia (50%), followed by grooves (31%) and enamel pits (19%) (P=.04). In the permanent dentition, diffuse and demarcated opacities were equally frequent, while enamel grooves were the commonest type of hypoplasia (52%), followed by missing enamel (35%) and enamel pits (5%; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

In a low-fluoride community, developmental defects of enamel were twice as common in the permanent dentition vs the primary dentition. In the primary dentition, the predominant defects were demarcated opacities and missing enamel, while in the permanent dentition, the defects were more variable.

PMID:
21703072
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Ingenta plc
Loading ...
Support Center