Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Eur Radiol. 2011 Oct;21(10):2218-25. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2171-x. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

Making renal stones change size-impact of CT image post processing and reader variability.

Author information

1
School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden. matsliden@yahoo.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The objectives of this study were to quantify the impact of image post-processing parameters on the apparent renal stone size, and to quantify the intra- and inter-reader variability in renal stone size estimation.

METHODS:

Fifty CT datasets including a renal or ureteral stone were included retrospectively during a prospective inclusion period. Each of the CT datasets was post-processed in different ways regarding slice thickness, slice increment and window setting. In the first part of the study a single reader repeated size estimations for the renal stones using different post-processing parameters. In the intra-reader variability experiment one reader reported size estimations for the same images with a one-week interval. The inter-reader variability data were obtained from 11 readers reporting size estimations for the same renal stones.

RESULTS:

The apparent stone size differed according to image post-processing parameters with the largest mean differences seen with regard to the window settings experiment (1.5 mm, p < 0.001) and slice thickness (0.8 mm, p < 0.001). Changes in parameters introduced a bias and a pseudo-random variability. The inter-reader variability was considerably larger than the intra-reader variability.

CONCLUSION:

Our results indicate a need for the standardisation of making measurements on CT images.

PMID:
21698465
DOI:
10.1007/s00330-011-2171-x
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center