Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jul;73(2):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 May 27.

Policy and practice in the use of root cause analysis to investigate clinical adverse events: mind the gap.

Author information

1
Warwick Business School, The University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. davide.nicolini@wbs.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper examines the challenges of investigating clinical incidents through the use of Root Cause Analysis. We conducted an 18-month ethnographic study in two large acute NHS hospitals in the U.K. and documented the process of incident investigation, reporting, and translation of the results into practice. We found that the approach has both strengths and problems. The latter stem, in part, from contradictions between potentially incompatible organizational agendas and social logics that drive the use of this approach. While Root Cause Analysis was originally conceived as an organisational learning technique, it is also used as a governance tool and a way to re-establish organisational legitimacy in the aftermath of incidents. The presence of such diverse and partially contradictory aims creates tensions with the result that efforts are at times diverted from the aim of producing sustainable change and improvement. We suggest that a failure to understand these inner contradictions, together with unreflective policy interventions, may produce counterintuitive negative effects which hamper, instead of further, the cause of patient safety.

PMID:
21683494
DOI:
10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.010
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center