Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;96(7):1931-42. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0398. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

Vitamin D and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author information

1
Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

Abstract

CONTEXT:

Several studies found association between vitamin D levels and hypertension, coronary artery calcification, and heart disease.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence on the effect of vitamin D on cardiovascular outcomes.

DESIGN AND METHODS:

We searched electronic databases from inception through August 2010 for randomized trials. Reviewers working in duplicate and independently extracted study characteristics, quality, and the outcomes of interest. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the relative risks (RR) and the weighted mean differences across trials.

RESULTS:

We found 51 eligible trials with moderate quality. Vitamin D was associated with nonsignificant effects on the patient-important outcomes of death [RR, 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.93, 1.00; P = 0.08], myocardial infarction (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93, 1.13; P = 0.64), and stroke (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.88, 1.25; P = 0.59). These analyses were associated with minimal heterogeneity. There were no significant changes in the surrogate outcomes of lipid fractions, glucose, or diastolic or systolic blood pressure. The latter analyses were associated with significant heterogeneity, and the pooled estimates were trivial in absolute terms.

CONCLUSIONS:

Trial data available to date are unable to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in mortality and cardiovascular risk associated with vitamin D. The quality of the available evidence is low to moderate at best.

PMID:
21677037
DOI:
10.1210/jc.2011-0398
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center