Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Integr Comp Biol. 2007 Jul;47(1):16-54. Epub 2007 May 27.

Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control.

Author information

1
*Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768; Concord Field Station, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Bedford, MA 01730, USA; Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, and Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Ghent, Belgium; Department of Biology, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA 91711; Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106; Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1800; Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140; Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; Department of Physiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322; **Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106; Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Wilmington, NC 28409, USA.

Abstract

Neuromechanics seeks to understand how muscles, sense organs, motor pattern generators, and brain interact to produce coordinated movement, not only in complex terrain but also when confronted with unexpected perturbations. Applications of neuromechanics include ameliorating human health problems (including prosthesis design and restoration of movement following brain or spinal cord injury), as well as the design, actuation and control of mobile robots. In animals, coordinated movement emerges from the interplay among descending output from the central nervous system, sensory input from body and environment, muscle dynamics, and the emergent dynamics of the whole animal. The inevitable coupling between neural information processing and the emergent mechanical behavior of animals is a central theme of neuromechanics. Fundamentally, motor control involves a series of transformations of information, from brain and spinal cord to muscles to body, and back to brain. The control problem revolves around the specific transfer functions that describe each transformation. The transfer functions depend on the rules of organization and operation that determine the dynamic behavior of each subsystem (i.e., central processing, force generation, emergent dynamics, and sensory processing). In this review, we (1) consider the contributions of muscles, (2) sensory processing, and (3) central networks to motor control, (4) provide examples to illustrate the interplay among brain, muscles, sense organs and the environment in the control of movement, and (5) describe advances in both robotics and neuromechanics that have emerged from application of biological principles in robotic design. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that (1) intrinsic properties of muscle contribute to dynamic stability and control of movement, particularly immediately after perturbations; (2) proprioceptive feedback reinforces these intrinsic self-stabilizing properties of muscle; (3) control systems must contend with inevitable time delays that can simplify or complicate control; and (4) like most animals under a variety of circumstances, some robots use a trial and error process to tune central feedforward control to emergent body dynamics.

PMID:
21672819
DOI:
10.1093/icb/icm024

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center