Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Proteomics. 2011 Jul;11(14):2931-5. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100045. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

Comparison between procedures using SDS for shotgun proteomic analyses of complex samples.

Author information

1
Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Abstract

Filter-aided sample preparation (FASP) and a new sample preparation method using a modified commercial SDS removal spin column are quantitatively compared in terms of their performance for shotgun proteomic experiments in three complex proteomic samples: a Saccharomyces cerevisiae lysate (insoluble fraction), a Caenorhabditis elegans lysate (soluble fraction), and a human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK293T). The characteristics and total number of peptides and proteins identified are compared between the two procedures. The SDS spin column procedure affords a conservative fourfold improvement in throughput, is more reproducible, less expensive (i.e. requires less materials), and identifies between 30 and 107% more peptides at q≤0.01, than the FASP procedure. The peptides identified by SDS spin column are more hydrophobic than species identified by the FASP procedure as indicated by the distribution of GRAVY scores. Ultimately, these improvements correlate to as great as a 50% increase in protein identifications with two or more peptides.

PMID:
21656683
PMCID:
PMC3517139
DOI:
10.1002/pmic.201100045
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center