Send to

Choose Destination
QJM. 2011 Oct;104(10):839-47. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcr077. Epub 2011 Jun 6.

Estimating glomerular filtration rate: comparison of the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations in a large UK cohort with particular emphasis on the effect of age.

Author information

Clinical Biochemistry, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Ethelbert Road, Canterbury, Kent CT1 3NG, UK.



The chronic kidney disease (CKD)-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation was developed to address the underestimation of measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation at levels >60 mL/min/1.73 m(2).


To assess the impact of the CKD-EPI equation on the estimation of GFR in a large adult UK population (n = 561,400), particularly looking at the effect of age.


Serum creatinine results (ID-MS-aligned enzymatic assay) were extracted from the pathology database during 1 year on adult (≥ 18 years) patients from primary care.


The first available creatinine result from 174,448 people was used to estimate GFR using both equations and agreement assessed.


Median CKD-EPI GFR was significantly higher than median MDRD GFR (82 vs. 76 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P < 0.0001). Overall mean bias between CKD-EPI and MDRD GFR was 5.0%, ranging from 13.0% in the 18-29 years age group down to -7.5% in those aged ≥ 90 years. Although statistically significant at all age groups the difference diminished with age and the agreement in GFR category assignment increased. Age-adjusted population prevalence of CKD Stages 3-5 was lower by CKD-EPI than by MDRD (4.4% vs. 4.9%).


CKD-EPI produces higher GFR and lower CKD estimates, particularly among 18-59 year age groups with MDRD estimated GFRs of 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (Stage 3A). However, at ages >70 years there is very little difference between the equations, and among the very elderly CKD-EPI may actually increase CKD prevalence estimates.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center