Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):270-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00093.x.

Implementation of best practice in advance care planning in an 'ageing in place' aged care facility.

Author information

1
SomerCare, Somerville, Victoria, Australia.

Abstract

Background  For many older people, a residential aged care facility is home, a place where they should have the choice to die comfortably with a sense of control of care and treatment. An advance care plan describes the process of planning end-of-life care while a person is still able to make decisions with the aim of using this information should a person become unable to communicate their wishes. In the residential aged care setting, an advance care plan should be based on discussions involving the resident, family members and caregivers regarding the beliefs, values and goals of the resident and their family. It is not limited to the final days and weeks before dying, it can encompass a positive and open attitude towards death and dying. Aim  The aim of this project was to examine the process of how residents' end-of-life care wishes is recorded and to ensure that the implementation of an advance care plan is performed according to the best available evidence. Method  There were four stages to the project. The first stage involved interpretation of the five audit criteria. The criteria related to involving residents and their families in an advance care plan, providing them with appropriate information about end-of-life issues, and ensuring that staff are appropriately trained about an advance care plan. Next, the records of staff and resident were audited using JBI-PACES, the Joanna Briggs Institute's Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System. The next stage (Getting Research into Practice, GRIP) involved a process of situational analysis, action planning and action taking to improve compliance with best practice, followed by a post-implementation audit. Results  Initially, compliance with an advance care plan best practice was fairly poor - less than 50% for each audit criterion. The GRIP phase highlighted seven barriers which were addressed during the implementation part of the project. These barriers included deficits related to the knowledge and education of residents, families and staff members, and issues related to administration and documentation, and concerns that any implementation process would not be sustainable. The post-implementation compliance was greater than 75% for each criterion. Conclusion  The project highlights the ongoing challenges of educating residents and families, as well as staff on the importance of discussing/completing an advance care plan. Several improvements were made to the facility's documentation and records keeping processes, including the identification of resident's wishes regarding end-of-life treatment. Residents and their families expressed a high level of satisfaction with these changes. Indeed, an increase in completed advance care plans at the facility had a clear benefit in improving care for residents towards the end of their life.

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Support Center