Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Jun;15(6):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 24.

Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and formal cognitive models: opposites attract?

Author information

1
Cognitive Science Center Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Plantage Muidergracht 24, 1018 TV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. buforstmann@gmail.com

Abstract

Cognitive neuroscientists study how the brain implements particular cognitive processes such as perception, learning, and decision-making. Traditional approaches in which experiments are designed to target a specific cognitive process have been supplemented by two recent innovations. First, formal cognitive models can decompose observed behavioral data into multiple latent cognitive processes, allowing brain measurements to be associated with a particular cognitive process more precisely and more confidently. Second, cognitive neuroscience can provide additional data to inform the development of formal cognitive models, providing greater constraint than behavioral data alone. We argue that these fields are mutually dependent; not only can models guide neuroscientific endeavors, but understanding neural mechanisms can provide key insights into formal models of cognition.

PMID:
21612972
PMCID:
PMC3384559
DOI:
10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.002
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center