Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Prof Nurs. 2011 May-Jun;27(3):168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.09.015.

Conceptual debates and empirical evidence about the peer review process for scholarly journals.

Author information

1
University of Tennessee, College of Nursing, Knoxville, TN 37996-4180, USA. sthomas@utk.edu

Abstract

Until recently, nursing scholars have seldom questioned the underlying premises of peer review, nor have they engaged in the conceptual debates about the peer review process. In this article, literature from a wide range of nursing and nonnursing journals was examined to provide an overview of (a) the conceptual debates and (b) the empirical evidence about the peer review process in scholarly journals. A multiplicity of questions for future research are proposed.

PMID:
21596357
DOI:
10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.09.015
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center