Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5):1375-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.036. Epub 2011 May 5.

Guideline methodology of the Society for Vascular Surgery including the experience with the GRADE framework.

Author information

1
Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. murad.mohammad@mayo.edu

Abstract

In 2006, the Society for Vascular Surgery began development of clinical practice guidelines to assist clinicians in the process of decision making. The Society selects clinical questions of high impact and evaluates the totality of evidence by identifying and conducting rigorous systematic reviews. Multidisciplinary committees follow the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework (GRADE), standard consensus, and voting procedures. Factors other than evidence, including patients' values and preferences and the availability of surgical expertise, are also considered. We describe, in the context of cumulative 4-years' experience, the methods and rigor of current procedures adopted by the Society for Vascular Surgery in developing practice guidelines. We also discuss potential future efforts needed to maximize the quality, adoption, and application of the clinical recommendations.

PMID:
21575755
DOI:
10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.036
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center