Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing a new two-component compression system with inelastic multicomponent compression bandages in the treatment of leg lymphedema

Dermatol Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):985-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02002.x. Epub 2011 May 16.

Abstract

Background: New, less-bulky, short-stretch compression bandages could be a valuable alternative in the management of lymphedema of the leg.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a two-component compression (2CC) system in the treatment of leg lymphedema with that of the traditional treatment with conventional inelastic multicomponent compression bandages (IMC).

Methods: Thirty hospitalized patients with moderate to severe unilateral lymphedema (stage II-III) of the leg were included. Patients were divided in two groups; one (n=15) received a 2CC, and the other (n=15) received IMC. Primary outcome was volume reduction of the affected leg; secondary outcome was loss of interface pressure.

Results: Median leg volumes before bandaging were 4,150 mL (2CC) and 4,360 mL (IMC). Median volume reduction after 2 hours was 120 mL (2.9%) with the 2CC system and 80 mL (1.8%) with IMC (p>.05). After 24 hours, volume reduction was 8.4% and 4.4% respectively (p>.05). Interface pressure dropped significantly within 2 hours of bandage application in both groups.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that the 2CC system forms a suitable alternative to IMC in the conventional treatment of moderate to severe lymphedema.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Compression Bandages*
  • Elasticity
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Leg / pathology*
  • Lymphedema / pathology*
  • Lymphedema / therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Organ Size
  • Pressure
  • Prospective Studies
  • Transducers, Pressure
  • Treatment Outcome