Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Neuroscientist. 2012 Feb;18(1):28-44. doi: 10.1177/1073858410395322. Epub 2011 May 6.

Which comes first in fragile X syndrome, dendritic spine dysgenesis or defects in circuit plasticity?

Author information

1
Departments of Neurology and Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. cpcailliau@mednet.ucla.edu

Abstract

The salient neuropathological defect in fragile X syndrome is the overabundance of immature dendritic spines in cortical pyramidal neurons. This review examines this anatomical synaptic defect in the context of other alterations in synaptic and circuit plasticity in fragile X mice. In theory, abnormal spines could lead to dysfunctional circuits and vice versa, so it is still not clear which problem comes first. Because of the tight structure-function relationships at the synapse, and given the significant overlap between signaling pathways that regulate spine shape/dynamics and long-term synaptic plasticity (both of which involve proteins regulated by fragile X mental retardation protein [FMRP]), it is argued that the two defects cannot be separated. It will be critical to determine whether neurons that lack FMRP and demonstrate alterations in long-term potentiation/depression also fail to undergo the expected enlargement/shrinkage of dendritic spines associated with those forms of synaptic plasticity or to establish clear links from FMRP signaling to either spine instability or defective synaptic plasticity, especially during critical periods of brain development. The resulting data will be vital in guiding translational research that can identify novel molecular targets for therapy in this devastating disorder.

PMID:
21551076
DOI:
10.1177/1073858410395322
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center