Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;64(10):1085-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.019. Epub 2011 May 6.

A framework for applying unfamiliar trial designs in studies of rare diseases.

Author information

1
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada. guptas@smh.toronto.on.ca

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Rare diseases may be difficult to study through conventional research methods, but are amenable to study through certain uncommonly used designs. We sought to explain these designs and to provide a framework to assist researchers in identifying the most appropriate design for a given research question.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING:

We systematically searched for literature describing rare disease research frameworks, trial designs, and trials that applied them. We present the advantages and disadvantages of each approach using these published examples, and a practical framework to help researchers in selecting between design choices.

RESULTS:

When research participants are limited, researchers should consider using: 1) a crossover design; 2) n-of-1 trials; or 3) one of the following adaptive designs: a) a response-adaptive randomization design, b) a ranking and selection design, c) an internal pilot design,or d) a sequential design. Bayesian analysis may be applied to conventional designs, or to any of these uncommon designs. Several of these approaches may also be used in combination. The choice between methods should be guided by factors related to the intervention, disease,anticipated recruitment duration and success, and current state of knowledge about the treatment.

CONCLUSION:

These techniques may facilitate research in rare diseases.

PMID:
21530171
DOI:
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.019
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Support Center