Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Dec;40(6):1183-7. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9764-y. Epub 2011 Apr 23.

Sex differences in semantic categorization.

Author information

1
Department of Paediatrics, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Box 116, Level 8, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK. vp265@cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Sex differences in certain cognitive abilities, including aspects of semantic processing, are well established. However, there have been no reports investigating a sex difference in semantic categorization. A total of 55 men and 58 women each judged 25 exemplars of natural categories (e.g., FRUITS) and 25 of artifact categories (e.g., TOOLS) as a nonmember, partial member, or full member of the given category. Participants also rated confidence for each judgment. Women provided a greater number of vague (partial member) judgments whereas men provided more inclusive (full member) judgments of artifacts but more exclusive (nonmember) judgments of natural categories. The sex difference in vagueness was observed across domains (Cohen's d = .56). Confidence predicted categorization among both men and women, such that more confident participants exhibited fewer vague category judgments. However, men and women were equally confident in their category judgments, and confidence failed to explain the sex difference in categorization. Men and women appear to categorize the same common objects in systematically different ways.

PMID:
21516365
DOI:
10.1007/s10508-011-9764-y
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center