(A) Repeated measures one-way ANOVA shows a significant difference in load accuracy (F (2,86) = 93.98, p<0.0005, effect size: eta-squared = .69) and reaction time (RT) (F(1,43) = 401.63, p<0.0005, eta-squared = .90). Posthoc Bonferroni corrected comparisons showed that all three means for both accuracy and RT were significantly different: subjects performed faster and more accurately on 0-back (accuracy, RT) 78%, 436) compared to 2-back (75.6%, 653) compared to 3-back trials (71%, 696). Error bars represent s.e.m. N=44 (B) Similar analyses revealed significant differences in trial type accuracy (F (1,43) = 81.14, p<0.0005, effect size: eta-squared = .65) and RT (F(1,43) = 362.78, p<0.0005, eta-squared = .89): nonlure (99%, 644), target (86%, 759), lure (76%, 1019). (C) Two-back lure trial performance as a function of genotype (met, val; N = 16, 24) and estradiol status (high, low; N = 21, 20). Met/met + low E subjects (91% ± 2.9% correct (mean ± s.e.m.)) performed significantly better than val/val + low E subjects (77% ± 3.7%; p=0.041, 2-tailed t-test). (D) COMT enzyme activity level by genotype, depicting variance within met/met and val/val genotypes (overlaid on mean values; pale grey bars). (Blood samples from three heterozygous val/met samples were analyzed and are included for display only.) (E) For low estradiol subjects (right panel), COMT enzyme correlates negatively with 2-back lure accuracy (r= −.482; p=.043). For high estradiol subjects (left panel), COMT enzyme correlates positively with 3-back lure accuracy (approached significance r=.433; p=.056).