Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Isr Med Assoc J. 2011 Feb;13(2):80-3.

Meta-analysis of unexpected findings in routine histopathology during total joint replacement.

Author information

  • 1Department of Orthopedics, HaEmek Medical Center, Afula, Israel. guy_ru@clalit.org.il

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Routine histopathological analysis of bone extracted during total joint replacement is controversial.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the utility of routine histopathological analysis in total joint replacement.

METHODS:

We calculated the risk for discrepant diagnosis between the pre- and postoperative histopathological results by performing a meta-analysis of 11 studies (including our data). We also calculated the risk for significant discrepancies.

RESULTS:

The discrepant diagnoses analysis showed a random effect of 3% discrepancies (95% confidence interval 1.2-3.7%). Funnel plot indicates a publication bias; consequently, the conclusions from this analysis should be interpreted with caution. Regarding the significant discrepancy in diagnosis, we performed a meta-analysis of nine studies. Fixed-effects analysis of all the studies resulted in 0.16% significant discrepancies (95% CI 0.02-0.30%) with no heterogeneity (Q = 3.93, degrees of freedom = 9, P = 0.14, /2 = 49.2%), and appropriate fixed-effects models.

CONCLUSIONS:

We recommend no further routine histological examination, reserving this tool for cases with a controversial primary diagnosis and unexpected findings during the operation.

PMID:
21443031
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Israel Medical Association
    Loading ...
    Support Center