Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Environ Health Prev Med. 2001 Jul;6(2):63-73. doi: 10.1007/BF02897948.

Cost-benefit analysis methods for assessing air pollution control programs in urban environments-A review.

Author information

1
Department of Public Health and Oceupational Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo.

Abstract

The most common method of evaluating beneficial impacts of environmental policies is cost-benefit analysis (CBA). In the present review, CBA methods for air pollution impacts are reviewed. Three types of air pollution effects are identified, including health, productivity, and amenity. Market valuation, stated preference methods, and revealed preference methods are identified for valuing benefits. Three types of costs are deseribed, including private sector costs, societal costs, and governmental regulatory costs. A benefits valuation approach based on Freeman's principals is described. A costs valuation approach based on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Dixon et al. principals is deseribed. Limitations associated with estimates of benefits and costs are summarized. Input assumptions and results are compared for several existing air pollution control analyses. The importance of CBA in environmental policy studies is discussed. Our conceptual approaches should be useful in analyses of urban air pollution impacts and air pollution prevention policies.

KEYWORDS:

benefit valuation; cost estimation; cost-benefit analysis; environmental policy; urban air pollution

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center