Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr;22(4):538-44. doi: 10.1177/0956797611402511. Epub 2011 Mar 14.

Under threat of social exclusion, females exclude more than males.

Author information

1
Department of Psychology, Emmanuel College, 400 The Fenway, Boston, MA 02115, USA. joyce.benenson@gmail.com

Abstract

Theoretical analyses and studies with children suggest that females are more likely than males to respond to threats of social exclusion with exclusion. Here we present a series of studies using a modified version of a computerized competitive game that participants play against two fictitious opponents. In previous studies, females and males have typically made identical strategy choices when playing this game. We show that when players are told that the two fictitious opponents may form an exclusionary alliance against them, females modify their competitive strategies by forming more preventive exclusionary alliances than males do. These results support the idea that adult females are more likely than males to form preventive exclusionary alliances when faced with a social threat. The results further suggest that females and males compete in different ways.

PMID:
21403174
DOI:
10.1177/0956797611402511
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center