Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011 Apr;18(3):247-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01662.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.

The British research evidence for recovery, papers published between 2006 and 2009 (inclusive). Part One: a review of the peer-reviewed literature using a systematic approach.

Author information

1
School of Nursing, Midwifery & Physiotherapy, University of Nottingham, Duncan MacMillan House, Nottingham, UK. theo.stickley@nottingham.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper is the first in a series of two which reviews the contemporary British evidence-base relating to recovery in mental health over a 4-year period. This review uses a systematic approach analysing the British peer-reviewed literature relating to recovery and mental health. The second paper in the series reviews the non-peer-reviewed literature. Recovery is not a new concept; however, it has recently become increasingly prevalent in practitioner, policy and research discourses. In total 12 papers met the inclusion criteria. Five main themes emerged from the analysis: hope and optimism, meaning to life, activities promoting recovery, definitions and discourses and implications for mental health practice. By including only peer-reviewed literature this paper is in a strong position to analyse the theoretical development of the recovery concept and highlight future directions for recovery in mental health services.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Support Center