Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Curr Urol Rep. 2011 Jun;12(3):229-36. doi: 10.1007/s11934-011-0180-6.

Quality of evidence to compare outcomes of open and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Author information

  • 1Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, MMC 394, 420 Delaware Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55403, USA.

Abstract

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has gained widespread acceptance in the treatment of prostate cancer. While it increasingly is becoming the surgical approach of choice in many centers, limited data exist directly comparing it to radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). This review examines the evidence comparing RALP to RRP. The outcomes evaluated are arranged into perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes. Of the 21 publications meeting our selection criteria, Level II, III, and IV evidence were found in 9, 1, and 11 articles, respectively. Overall, RALP was associated with lower blood loss, transfusion rates, length of stay, and higher cost when compared to RRP. Definitive conclusions regarding complications and oncologic and functional outcomes are not yet possible, and will require longer-term follow-up and well-designed randomized controlled trials.

PMID:
21365234
DOI:
10.1007/s11934-011-0180-6
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center