Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Mar;127(3):1300-10. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318205f41b.

A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation.

Author information

1
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. macodner@aol.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

This study evaluated patients who underwent primary breast surgery within a single group practice from 1994 to 2009. Reoperations were divided by reoperation reason into total reoperations and implant-specific reoperations. The authors hypothesized that the implant-specific reoperation rate will provide the most accurate measurement of complications caused by the breast implant device.

METHODS:

A total of 812 patients received the same brand of breast implant for primary breast augmentation or augmentation/mastopexy. Safety and efficacy data were recorded and complication rates were calculated. Statistics were applied using Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence calculations.

RESULTS:

This study included 482 patients with saline and 330 patients with silicone implants. The most common complications included capsular contracture, rippling, rupture, infection, and hematoma. A total of 8.2 percent of patients developed Baker grade III/IV capsular contracture by 6 years. The raw incidence of rippling was 7.1 percent, and the rate was significantly increased in underweight patients with subglandular saline implants (p = 0.045). The rate of total reoperation at 1 year was 14.2 percent. While a significantly increased rate of total reoperation was seen for silicone compared with saline implants (p < 0.01), no difference was seen in the rate of implant-specific reoperation for saline compared to silicone implants (p = 0.582).

CONCLUSIONS:

The use of total reoperation rates as an indication of complications of breast implants can lead to both an overestimation of implant-related complications and the inaccurate conclusion that silicone implants result in higher complication rates than saline implants. The implant-specific reoperation rate may provide a more accurate incidence of implant complications than the total reoperation rate, which includes reoperations for factors unrelated to the implant.

PMID:
21364430
DOI:
10.1097/PRS.0b013e318205f41b
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center