Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar;7(1):75-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2010.01355.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.

Comparison of daily filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia in Asian lymphoma patients.

Author information

1
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore. phaac@nus.edu.sg

Abstract

AIM:

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a highly prevalent complication of chemotherapy, particularly in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in Asian lymphoma patients by evaluating the incidence of FN and associated complications.

METHODS:

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study in Asian lymphoma patients who received chemotherapy with primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors support between January 2008 and August 2009. Data were analyzed using an intent-to-treat approach, which aimed to reflect actual prescribing practices.

RESULTS:

A total of 204 Asian lymphoma patients were included in this study, with 81 patients in the filgrastim arm and 123 patients in the pegfilgrastim arm. Overall, the incidence of breakthrough FN was similar between the two groups of patients (13.6%: filgrastim arm vs 16.3%: pegfilgrastim arm; P=0.69). Neutropenic complications such as chemotherapy treatment delay and chemotherapy dose reduction were similar between the two arms.

CONCLUSION:

In Asian patients, pegfilgrastim prophylaxis did not show a therapeutic advantage for preventing neutropenic outcomes compared with filgrastim prophylaxis.

[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center