Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Jul;19(7):1069-76. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1400-9. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with robotic and conventional techniques: a prospective, randomized study.

Author information

1
Center for Joint Diseases, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 160 Ilsimri, Hwasuneup, Hwasungun, Jeonnam 519-809, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

The authors performed this study to compare the outcomes of robotic-assisted and conventional TKA in same patient simultaneously. It was hypothesized that the robotic-assisted procedure would produce better leg alignment and component orientation, and thus, improve patient satisfaction and clinical and radiological outcomes.

METHODS:

Thirty patients underwent bilateral sequential total knee replacement. One knee was replaced by robotic-assisted implantation and the other by conventional implantation.

RESULTS:

Radiographic results showed significantly more postoperative leg alignment outliers of conventional sides than robotic-assisted sides (mechanical axis, coronal inclination of the femoral prosthesis, and sagittal inclination of the tibial prosthesis). Robotic-assisted sides had non-significantly better postoperative knee scores and ROMs. Robotic-assisted sides needed longer operation times (25 min, SD ± 18) and longer skin incisions. Nevertheless, postoperative bleeding was significantly less for robotic-assisted sides.

CONCLUSION:

The better alignment accuracy of robotic TKA and the good clinical results achieved may favorably influence clinical and radiological outcomes.

PMID:
21311869
DOI:
10.1007/s00167-011-1400-9
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Support Center