Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Feb;30(2):332-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0917.

What are the respective roles of the public and private sectors in pharmaceutical innovation?

Author information

1
Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA. bns3@columbia.edu

Abstract

What are the respective roles of the public and private sectors in drug development? This question is at the heart of some policy proposals, such as those that would give the government a share of profits from drugs at least partly developed with federal research dollars. This paper provides empirical data on these issues, using information included in the patents on drugs approved between 1988 and 2005. Overall, we find that direct government funding is more important in the development of "priority-review" drugs-sometimes described as the most innovative new drugs-than it is for "standard-review" drugs. Government funding has played an indirect role-for example, by funding basic underlying research that is built on in the drug discovery process-in almost half of the drugs approved and in almost two-thirds of priority-review drugs. Our analyses should help inform thinking about the returns on public research funding-a topic of long-standing interest to economists, policy makers, and health advocates.

PMID:
21289355
DOI:
10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0917
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center