Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Feb;20(2):128-33. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.034389. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

Doctors' handovers in hospitals: a literature review.

Author information

1
School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen AB24 2UB, UK. mraduma-tomas@adbn.ac.uk

Abstract

AIM:

To review studies on hospital doctors' handovers to identify the methods and main findings.

METHOD:

A literature search of electronic databases Medline and Embase (via Ovid) was conducted against a set of inclusion criteria.

RESULTS:

A total of 32 papers were identified. The most common methods of studying handovers were observations and interviews, which typically focused on the sign-out (ie, handover meeting). This is just one stage of the handover process: pre- and posthandover phases were rarely examined. Although providing useful descriptive information, the studies rarely evaluated the quality of handover practices. While communication is generally recognised as the critical component, there has been little training of this skill.

CONCLUSION:

The handover literature does not fully identify where communication failures typically occur or influencing conditions, thus hampering the design of effective handover training and tools. A systematic analysis of all the stages of doctors' handovers is required.

PMID:
21209133
DOI:
10.1136/bmjqs.2009.034389
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Support Center