Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Apr;35(5):1302-4. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.004. Epub 2010 Dec 17.

Why do we yawn? The importance of evidence for specific yawn-induced effects.

Author information

1
University of Geneva, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurorehabilitation, Avenue de Beau-Séjour 26, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. aguggis@gmail.com

Abstract

Gallup (this issue) believes that our recent review on the function of yawning (Guggisberg et al., 2010) is unbalanced and that it ignores evidence for his thermoregulation hypothesis. Here we address these criticisms and show them to be untenable. While we never claimed that the social hypothesis of yawning has "definite experimental support", we emphasize the importance of experimental evidence for specific effects of yawns when considering why we yawn. The only specific effect of yawning that could be demonstrated so far is its contagiousness in humans, some non-human primates, and possibly dogs, whereas all studies investigating physiological consequences of yawns were unable to observe specific yawn-induced effects in the individual of any species. The argument that from an evolutionary perspective, yawns must have a "primitive" physiological function arises from imprecise reasoning.

PMID:
21168437
DOI:
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center