Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;91(2):246-52. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.11.022. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

Risk of progression of nephropathy in a population-based sample with type 2 diabetes.

Author information

1
The Center for Health Research/Southeast, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, GA 30305, United States. suma.vupputuri@kp.org

Abstract

AIMS:

Progression through stages of nephropathy has not been well described in a large, well-characterized, population-based study. Our aims were to describe the progression of nephropathy and identify characteristics associated with progression in a U.S. population-based sample.

METHODS:

We identified 10,290 members of a managed care organization who had hypertension and type 2 diabetes, a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) measurement in 2001-2003, and at least 2 follow-up UACRs. Progression of nephropathy was defined as progression to a higher stage of nephropathy than was present at baseline.

RESULTS:

At baseline, 57% had normoalbuminuria, 31% had microalbuminuria, and 12% had macroalbuminuria. The incidence of nephropathy progression (per 1000 person-years) was 94.7, 35.1, and 6.5 for normo-, micro-, and macro-albuminuria, respectively. ACEi/ARB use ranged from 61-67%, except among patients with macroalbuminuria at follow-up. Age, diabetes duration, and A1C were significant predictors of progression.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study, one of the first to examine the progression of nephropathy in a U.S. population-based sample, showed that among adults with diabetes and hypertension, the burden of nephropathy and its progression may be greater than previously reported. Further, the use of ACEi/ARBs was not optimal.

PMID:
21156326
DOI:
10.1016/j.diabres.2010.11.022
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center